The ideas of a self-proclaimed 'scholar' called Robert Mo
rey paved the way for other polemicists like Jack Chick
who drew a fictionalised racially stereotyped story entitled "All
ah had no son".
It's one of the common evangelical-based tract created by the devout Ame
rican artist who founded the publishing company Chick Publication, a company which claims to have sold over 750 tracts, comic tracts, videos, books, and post
ers designed to promote fundamentalist Protestant Evangelicalism by accusing Muslims, Freemasons, and Catholics alike.
As for me personally, I don't have problem with the image on the left, because it's trying to convey the main message of this story in such an absurd way, but if we look on the image on the right, we see the Muslim character suddenly left his prayer after he was in a reverentially proneposition (Sujuud), Muslims know the fact that uttering such words will nullify the prayer as a whole, so why on earth would a Muslim invalidate his prayer to ask himself "Moon God?"?
It's clear, our Arabian Muslim fellow seems to be an evil character, on the contrary we see the polite 'enemy-lover' saying "But sir". the question is who
gave this Muslim the right to kill the guy? Jack Chick used a citation from the Qur'an
Never underestimate the ignorance of these people, they misquoted one of the verse of 'Hudud' that refers to a class of punishment for certain crimes.
Jack Chick certainly know that Islam could be a real danger for his religion, therefore he had to present Islam as a form of conspiracy, and a dangerous idea using his wicked Muslim character
continue .......
The man is talking incoherently, from the bible to Prophet Mohammed عليه الصلاة والسلام to crucification and divinity of prophet Jesus عليه الصلاة والسلام.
Let's leave the alleged 'amazing discoveries' by Robert Morey and have a look on the following verses, we will talk about those discoveries and fabrication in another separate articles:
“ So have you considered al-Lat and al-‘Uzza? And Manat, the third - the other one? Is the male for you and for Him the female? That, then, is an unjust division. They are not but [mere] names you have named them - you and your forefathers - for which Allah has sent down no authority. They follow not except assumption and what [their] souls desire, and there has already come to them from their Lord guidance. ” Qur'an 53:19-23
“ Unquestionably, for Allah is the pure religion. And those who take protectors besides Him [say], "We only worship them that they may bring us nearer to Allah in position." Indeed, Allah will judge between them concerning that over which they differ.” Qur'an 39:3
Will leave Arab Christians to make remarks about the right picture, what's more interesting to me is the other picture, the use of crescent as a symbol doesn't mean the symbol was used in early Islam, during the early centuries of Islam, Prophet Mohammed and early Muslim authorities simply didn't use any geometric symbols to symbolise Islam, in the way that the cross symbolises Christianity, the menorah was a commonly-occurring symbol of Judaism, etc. . This is why early Islamic coins were covered with Arabic writing, but contained no visual symbols, Though the crescent was originally a secular symbol of authority for Muslim rulers. That's how crescent moon and star became affiliated with the Muslim world.
And with regards to "Ramadan begins and ends with the crescent moon" this is a weak claim, because it's the ninth lunar month of the Islamic calender, the first day of a month is the day when an astronomical new moon, there is also Hebrew calender which uses the new moon to mark the beginning and the end of a month.
Isn't it silly to say Jewish people worship moon because they observe the new moon for their own special occasions?
Or would the answer be " It's not good to ask such questions"?
Morey has labelled the statue as as a "Moon-god", meanwhile the statue was described can represent a deity, a king, or a priest, let alone the name of that statue and the false allegation that it's called Allah
Here is one of greatest myth of their doctrine "God died", but the question is: How can you claim Monotheism and Trinity in the same breath? The existence of a trinity is admittedly not demonstrable by logic or scriptural proof.
If Jesus is the ONE Lord and the absolute truth, how can he be given the authority to execute judgment? in fact who is giving him the authority to do so? John 5: 27 reveals the hoax of this incomprehensibly doctrine 'Trinity'.
That's IF it's true.
Jesus didn't come to die, the irony is that Jews of Palestine were expected the arrival of a Messiah who’d overthrow the Roman occupation, not to be crucified by them! Jesus stated that the purpose of his ministry was to preach the Law and the Gospel to the Children of Israel
Once again, Jesus said "I am the way" to God's mercy doesn't mean he's divine, he didn't say he's the "destination" which would be the case if he were God Qur'an 11:14 what can we expect from a messenger to say except they are our guide? Qur'an 6:153
Another hoax of the crucifixion "Jesus' sacrifice", according to the Gospels Jesus was unwilling to die John 7:1
The Muslim start uttering the prayers in Christian style, even though didn't embrace the faith.
And I must tell you that these all were lies.
